Carroll v. State of California et al
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/22/2018 DENYING without prejudice 47 Motion for Leave to Amend. Plaintiff granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TREMAYNE DEON CARROLL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 16-cv-1759 TLN KJN P
v.
ORDER
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with this civil rights action
18
seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 8, 2018, the court granted plaintiff sixty
19
days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 46.)
On February 15, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint. (ECF
20
21
No. 47.) Plaintiff’s motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint.
22
As a prisoner, plaintiff’s pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma
23
pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Because plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended
24
complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 47) is denied without prejudice;
27
////
28
////
1
1
2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint;
2
failure to file an amended complaint within that time will result a recommendation of dismissal of
3
this action.
4
Dated: February 22, 2018
5
6
7
Carr1759.ord
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?