Carroll v. State of California et al
Filing
8
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/21/2016 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TREMAYNE DEON CARROLL,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 2:16-cv-1759 TLN KJN P
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
By an order filed August 11, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma
18
pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, and was cautioned
19
that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty
20
day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed
21
the required documents.
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice.
24
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
25
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
26
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
27
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
28
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
1
1
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
2
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
3
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
4
Dated: September 21, 2016
5
6
7
8
Carr1759.fifp
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?