Gomez v. Target Corporation
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/29/17: This action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ARMANDO GOMEZ,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01777-JAM-EFB
Plaintiff,
12
Assigned to the Hon. John A. Mendez
13
14
15
v.
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant.
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
[Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
16
Complaint Filed: July 30, 2015
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
Case no. 2:16-cv-01777-JAM-EFB
4853-0592-9807v.1 0052951-000032
1
2
ORDER
In consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Action with Prejudice, signed by
3
plaintiff Armando Gomez and defendant Target Corporation through their counsel of record, IT IS
4
HEREBY ORDERED that the entire action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R.
5
Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
DATED: 9/29/2017
10
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
Case no. 2:16-cv-01777-JAM-EFB
4853-0592-9807v.1 0052951-000032
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?