Gomez v. Target Corporation

Filing 31

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/29/17: This action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMANDO GOMEZ, Case No. 2:16-cv-01777-JAM-EFB Plaintiff, 12 Assigned to the Hon. John A. Mendez 13 14 15 v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] 16 Complaint Filed: July 30, 2015 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Case no. 2:16-cv-01777-JAM-EFB 4853-0592-9807v.1 0052951-000032 1 2 ORDER In consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Action with Prejudice, signed by 3 plaintiff Armando Gomez and defendant Target Corporation through their counsel of record, IT IS 4 HEREBY ORDERED that the entire action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. 5 Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED: 9/29/2017 10 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Case no. 2:16-cv-01777-JAM-EFB 4853-0592-9807v.1 0052951-000032

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?