Perkins v. Adams, et al.

Filing 53

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/3/2019 ADOPTED in FULL 51 Findings and Recommendations, and GRANTING 40 Motion for Summary Judgment as to defendant Y. Mansour and DENIED as to Adams. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RANDY PERKINS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-1791 JAM CKD P

v.

ORDER

A. ADAMS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 23, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20
21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant Adams has

23

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 23, 2019 are adopted in full; and

3

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 40) is granted as to defendant

4

Mansour and denied as to defendant Adams.

5
6
7
8

DATED: June 3, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________

_____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2