Perkins v. Adams, et al.

Filing 73

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/17/22 APPOINTING Attorney Shahid Manzoor for Plaintiff. Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park via email at spark@caed.uscourts.gov if he has any questions related to the appo intment. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Shahid Manzoor, Manzoor Law Firm, 3017 Douglas Blvd., Suite 104, Roseville, CA 95661. A Final Pretrial Conference SET for 11/18/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. All other dates and deadlines are VACATED. The parties shall meet and confer and file a joint Pretrial Statement no less than three weeks prior to the Final Pretrial Conference. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY ERIC PERKINS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:16-cv-01791-KJM-CKD P ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL A. ADAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state inmate, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court finds the appointment of counsel for 19 plaintiff warranted. Shahid Manzoor has been selected from the court’s pro bono attorney panel 20 to represent plaintiff and has agreed to be appointed. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Shahid Manzoor is appointed as plaintiff’s counsel in the above titled matter. 23 2. Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park via email at spark@caed.uscourts.gov if he 24 25 26 27 28 has any questions related to the appointment. 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Shahid Manzoor, Manzoor Law Firm, 3017 Douglas Blvd., Suite 104, Roseville, CA 95661. 4. A final pretrial conference is set for November 18, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3 before the undersigned. All other dates and deadlines are vacated. At least one of the 1 1 2 attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial 3 Conference. 4 5. The parties shall meet and confer and file a joint Pretrial Statement no less than three 5 weeks prior to the Final Pretrial Conference. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 282. The provisions 6 of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the matters to be included in the joint pretrial 7 statement. 8 6. All motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial statement. In 9 most cases, motions in limine are addressed and resolved on the morning of the first day 10 of trial. The parties may alert the court at the Final Pretrial Conference and in their final 11 Joint Pretrial Statement that a particular motion or motions should be resolved earlier. At 12 the Final Pretrial Conference, the court will set a briefing and hearing schedule on the 13 motions in limine as necessary. The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a 14 pretrial procedural device designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court 15 looks with disfavor upon dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference 16 or at Trial in the guise of motions in limine. 17 18 7. The dates and deadlines set in this order will not be reset absent a showing of good cause. DATED: August 17, 2022. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?