McGee v. State of California et al
Filing
49
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/19/2017: ADOPTING 40 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 13 , 22 Motion to Dismiss as to The County of Sacramento and State of California; DENYING 15 Motion for Default Judgment. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEFFERSON A. McGEE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-1796-JAM-EFB PS
v.
ORDER
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On March 3, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
17
18
were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
19
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on March 20,
20
2017, and they were considered by the undersigned.
This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which
21
22
objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore
23
Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As
24
to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court
25
assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. United
26
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
27
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
28
/////
1
1
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
2
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.
3
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
4
1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 3, 2017, are adopted;
5
2. The County of Sacramento and State of California’s motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 13,
6
22) are granted and all claims against these defendants are dismissed without leave to amend;
7
and
8
9
3. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 15) is denied.
DATED: April 19, 2017
10
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?