Bernal v. Zumiez, Inc.
Filing
76
ORDER signed by District Judge Stanley A. Bastian on 5/4/2022 GRANTING Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement and STAYING all dates and deadlines associated with the Action other than those contemplated herein and in the Stipulation of Settlement, and pertaining to the administration of the settlement of the Action. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
AT SACRAMENTO
9
10 ALEXIA HERRERA, individually and on
No. 2:16-CV-01802-SB
11 behalf of all others similarly situated,
12
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
13
v.
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
14 ZUMIEZ, INC., and DOES 1 through 10,
CLASS ACTION AND PAGA
15 inclusive,
SETTLEMENT
16
Defendants.
17
18
Before the Court is the parties’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class
19 Action Settlement, ECF No. 73. The Court heard oral argument on the motion on
20 April 26, 2022 by videoconference. Plaintiff was represented by Cody Kennedy,
21 who appeared by video. Defendant was represented by Nathan Austin, who
22 appeared by video.
23
At the hearing, the parties indicated that they both agreed to the proposed
24 terms of the class action settlement. Thus, based on both the parties’ arguments and
25 the Court’s own review of the settlement agreement, the Court orally granted the
26 motion for preliminary approval. The Court now enters the parties’ proposed order
27 into the record.
28 //
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
AND PAGA SETTLEMENT # 1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
2
1.
The Court grants preliminary approval of the Settlement and the
3 Settlement Class based upon the terms set forth in the Joint Stipulation of Class
4 Action Settlement and Release (“Stipulation of Settlement”) filed herewith. All
5 terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Stipulation of
6 Settlement.
7
2.
The Settlement set forth in the Joint Stipulation of Settlement and
8 Release Between Plaintiff and Defendant, for a Gross Settlement Amount of
9 $2,800,000, appears to be fair, adequate and reasonable to the Class. The
10 Settlement falls within the range of reasonableness and appears to be
11 presumptively valid, subject only to any objections that may be raised at the final
12 fairness hearing and final approval by this Court. It further appears that
13 investigation and research have been conducted such that counsel for the Parties
14 are able to reasonably evaluate their respective positions. It further appears to the
15 Court that settlement at this time will avoid substantial additional costs by all
16 Parties, as well as avoid the delay and risks that would be presented by the further
17 prosecution of the Action. It further appears that the Settlement has been reached
18 as the result of intensive, serious and non-collusive, arms-length negotiations. The
19 Parties are ordered to carry out the settlement according to the terms of the
20 Settlement Agreement and in conformity with this Order. The Court has reviewed
21 the monetary recovery that is being granted as part of the Settlement and
22 preliminarily finds that the monetary settlement awards made available to Class
23 Members is fair, adequate, and reasonable when balanced against the probable
24 outcome of further litigation relating to certification, liability, and damages issues.
25
3.
A final fairness hearing on the question of whether the proposed
26 Settlement, attorneys’ fees to Class Counsel, costs of administration and the Class
27 Representative’s Enhancement Award should be finally approved as fair,
28
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
AND PAGA SETTLEMENT # 2
1 reasonable and adequate as to the members of the Class is scheduled in Department
2 39 on the date and time set forth in the implementation schedule below.
3
4.
This Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Proposed
4 Class Action Settlement (“Class Notice”) (Exhibit A). The Court approves the
5 procedure for Class Members to opt out of, or to object to, the Settlement as set
6 forth in the Joint Stipulation of Settlement and Release Between Plaintiff and
7 Defendant, and the Class Notice.
8
5.
The Court directs the mailing of the Class Notice by first class mail to
9 the Class Members in accordance with the Implementation Schedule set forth
10 below. The Court finds the dates selected for the mailing and distribution of the
11 Class Notice, as set forth in the Implementation Schedule, meet the requirements
12 of due process and provide the best notice practicable under the circumstances and
13 shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto.
14
6.
Specifically, the Class Notice fairly, plainly, accurately, and
15 reasonably informs Class Members of: (1) the nature of the Action, the definition
16 of the Class, the identity of Class Counsel, and the essential terms of the
17 Settlement, including the plan of allocation; (2) Named Plaintiff’s and Class
18 Counsel’s applications for the class representative's Enhancement Award, and
19 Class Counsel’s request for attorneys' fees and litigation costs; (3) a formula used
20 to determine the Class Member’s estimated Settlement Award payment; (4) how to
21 participate in the Settlement; (5) how to object to the Settlement or to opt-out if a
22 Class Member wishes to do so, and Class Members' right to appear through
23 counsel if they desire; and (6) how to obtain additional information regarding the
24 Action and the Settlement. The Court finds that the notice requirements of Federal
25 Rules of Civil Procedure 23(c)(2)(B) satisfied, and that the Class Notice that will
26 be provided adequately advises Class Members of their rights under the settlement.
27 Counsel for the Parties are authorized to correct any typographical errors in the
28 Class Notice and to make clarifications, to the extent the same are found or needed,
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
AND PAGA SETTLEMENT # 3
1 so long as such corrections do not materially alter the substance of the documents.
2 The Court further finds that the distribution of the Class Notice substantially in the
3 manner and form set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement and this Order meets the
4 requirements of due process, is the best notice practicable under the circumstances,
5 and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto. The
6 Court orders the mailing of the Notice Packet by first class mail, pursuant to the
7 terms set forth in the Agreement.
7.
8
It is ordered that the Settlement Class is preliminarily certified for
9 settlement purposes only. For Settlement purposes only, the Court conditionally
10 certifies the following Class: all persons who are employed or have been employed
11 by Defendant in California as “hourly employees” for the period August 1, 2012
12 through June 3, 2016. The Class Period is from August 1, 2012 through June 3,
13 2016.
14
8.
The Court concludes that, for settlement purposes only, the Class
15 meets the requirements for certification under Rule 23(b)(3) in that: (a) the Class is
16 ascertainable and so numerous that joinder of all Class Members is impracticable;
17 (b) common questions of law and fact predominate, and there is a well-defined
18 community of interest amongst the Class Members with respect to the subject
19 matter of the litigation; (c) the claims of the named Plaintiff are typical of the
20 claims of the Class Members; (d) the Class Representative will fairly and
21 adequately protect the interests of the Class Members; (e) a class action is superior
22 to other available methods for the efficient adjudication of this controversy; and (f)
23 counsel for the Class is qualified to act as counsel for the Class.
24
9.
The Court confirms Plaintiff Alexia Herrera as Class Representative,
25 and Marlin & Saltzman as Class Counsel.
26
10.
The Court confirms the appointment of Simpluris as the Settlement
27 Administrator.
28
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
AND PAGA SETTLEMENT # 4
1
11.
To facilitate administration of the Settlement pending final approval,
2 the Court hereby enjoins Plaintiff and all Class Members from filing or prosecuting
3 any claims, suits or administrative proceedings (including filing claims with the
4 Division of Labor Standards Enforcement of the California Department of
5 Industrial Relations) regarding claims released by the Settlement, unless and until
6 such Class Members have filed valid Requests for Exclusion with the Settlement
7 Administrator.
8
12.
The Court orders the following Implementation Schedule for further
9 proceedings:
10
11
12
Deadline for Defendant to Submit
Class Member Information to
Settlement Administrator
[14 calendar days after Order
granting Preliminary Approval]
Deadline for Settlement Administrator
to Mail Notice and Notice of
Settlement Award Form to Class
Members
[30 calendar days after Order
granting Preliminary Approval]
Deadline for Class Members to
Postmark Requests for Exclusion
[30 calendar days after mailing of
the Notice]
Deadline for Receipt by Court,
Settlement Administrator, and
Counsel of any Objections to
Settlement
[30 calendar days after mailing of
the Notice]
Deadline for Class Counsel to file
Motion for Final Approval of
Settlement, including Request for
Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and
Enhancement Award
[16 Court days before Final
Approval Hearing]
Deadline for Settlement Administrator
to file Declaration of Due Diligence
and Proof of Mailing
[16 Court days before Final
Approval Hearing]
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
AND PAGA SETTLEMENT # 5
1
2
3
Deadline for Defendant to provide
written Notice of Rescission of
Settlement to Class Counsel (if
applicable)
[14 calendar days before Final
Approval Hearing, provided
number and percentage of opt
outs previously provided to
Defendant]
Final Fairness Hearing and Final
Approval
June 21, 2022; 10:00 a.m.
Videoconference
Deadline for Defendant to fund
Settlement (if Settlement is Effective)
10 calendar days after Effective
Date]
Deadline for Defendant to Pay
Attorneys’ Fees and Litigation Costs
(if Settlement is Effective)
[15 calendar days after Effective
Date]
Deadline for Settlement Administrator
to mail the Settlement Awards and the
Enhancement Award, and to wire
transfer the Attorneys' Fees and Costs
(if Settlement is Effective)
[15 calendar days after Effective
Date]
Deadline for Class Members to cash
Settlement Award checks (if
Settlement is Effective)
[180 calendar days after
Settlement Administrator mails
the Settlement Awards and the
Enhancement Awards]
Deadline for Settlement Administrator
to distribute uncashed check amount
to State of California Unclaimed
Wages Fund or cy pres beneficiary as
applicable (if Settlement is Effective)
[Within 14 calendar days after
the deadline for Class Members
to cash Settlement Award
checks]
Settlement Administrator to File Proof
of Payment of Settlement Awards,
Enhancement Award, Attorneys’ Fees
and Costs, cy pres payment, and
payment to the LWDA (if Settlement
is Effective)
[Within 21 days calendar days
after the deadline for Settlement
Administrator to pay uncashed
check amount to State of
California Unclaimed Wages
Fund or cy pres beneficiary as
applicable]
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
13.
The Court reserves the right to adjourn or continue the date of the
27 final approval hearing and all dates provided for in the Agreement without further
28
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
AND PAGA SETTLEMENT # 6
1 notice to Class Members, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further
2 applications arising out of or connected with the proposed Settlement.
3
14.
As of the date this Order is signed, all dates and deadlines associated
4 with the Action shall be stayed, other than those contemplated herein and in the
5 Stipulation of Settlement, and pertaining to the administration of the settlement of
6 the Action.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order
8 and forward copies to counsel.
9
DATED this 4th day of May 2022.
10
11
12
13
14
___________________________________
Stanley A. Bastian
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
AND PAGA SETTLEMENT # 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
EXHIBIT A
Class Notice
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
AND PAGA SETTLEMENT # 8
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE
FOR FINAL APPROVAL
ALEXIA HERRERA v. ZUMIEZ, INC.
(United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:16-cv-1802-TLN-KJN)
Please read this Notice carefully. This Notice relates to a proposed settlement of class action litigation.
This Notice contains important information about your right to receive a payment from the Settlement
fund.
You have received this Notice of Class Action Settlement because Zumiez Inc.’s (“Zumiez”) records show you
are a “Class Member,” and therefore entitled to a payment from this class action Settlement. On
_______________, Judge Stanley A. Bastian of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
granted preliminary approval of this class action Settlement and ordered that all Class Members be notified of the
Settlement.
If you wish to be a part of the Settlement, and to receive a settlement payment, you do not need to do
anything further. However, your options are discussed in more detail below. The Final Fairness and Approval
Hearing on the adequacy, reasonableness, and fairness of the Settlement will be held at _______ __.m. on
___________________, in Courtroom 2, 15th Floor, of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
California, located at 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814. You are not required to attend the
Hearing, but you are welcome to do so.
What Is This Case About?
Alexia Herrera worked at Zumiez as an hourly employee. She is the “Plaintiff” and she is suing on behalf of
herself and all Class Members (defined below). Plaintiff sued Zumiez for violations of the California Labor Code
and Business and Professions Code including: (1) Failure to Pay Reporting Time; (2) Failure to Pay Minimum
Wage; (3) Failure to Maintain Required Business Records; (4) Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage
Statements; (5) Failure to Pay All Wages Earned At Termination; (6) Failure to Reimburse Business Expenses;
(7) Unlawful Business Practices; (8) Unfair Business Practices; (9) Civil Penalties Under the Private Attorney
General Act (“PAGA”).
On ___________________, the parties negotiated a Settlement on behalf of themselves and the Class Members
with the assistance of a class action mediator. The parties’ agreement has been documented in a proposed Joint
Stipulation of Settlement (“Joint Stipulation”).
Zumiez has not admitted any liability, and the U.S. District Court has made no ruling on the merits of Plaintiff’s
claims. The Court has only preliminarily approved the proposed Joint Stipulation. The Court will decide whether
to give final approval to the Settlement at the Final Fairness and Approval Hearing.
Plaintiff’s attorney is the law firm Marlin & Saltzman (“Class Counsel”). Class Counsel has investigated and
researched the facts and circumstances underlying the issues raised in this case and the applicable law. While
Class Counsel believes Plaintiff’s claims in this lawsuit have merit, Class Counsel also recognizes that the risk
and expense of continued litigation justify settlement. Because of this, Class Counsel believes the proposed
Settlement is fair, adequate, reasonable, and in the best interests of the Class Members.
Questions? Contact the Settlement Administrator toll free at 1-___-___-____
Page 1
Zumiez has denied, and continues to deny, Plaintiff’s factual and legal allegations. Zumiez believes this case has
no merit. By agreeing to settle, Zumiez is not admitting liability on any of the factual allegations or claims in this
case or that this case can or should proceed as a class action. Zumiez has agreed to settle this case solely for
economic efficiency.
Summary of the Settlement Terms
Plaintiff and Zumiez have agreed to settle this case on behalf of themselves and the Class Members in exchange
for the Maximum Settlement Amount of up to two million and eight hundred thousand dollars ($2,800,000.00).
The Maximum Settlement Amount includes: (1) Individual Settlement Awards to participating Class Members;
(2) Settlement Administration Costs estimated to be no more than $30,000; (3) a service payment of no more than
$25,000.00 to Plaintiff Alexia Herrera for her time and efforts in pursuing this case and in exchange for a general
release of claims against Zumiez; (4) a $120,000.00 payment to the California Labor and Workforce Development
Agency for settlement of the PAGA claims; and (5) subject to Court approval of an application for fees and costs,
an award of up to $933,333.33 in attorneys’ fees and litigation costs and expenses to Class Counsel. After
deducting the Settlement Administration Costs, the service payment to Plaintiffs, the payment to the California
Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and attorneys’ fees and costs/expenses, a total of approximately
$___________ will be available for distribution to Class Members who participate in the Settlement (“Net
Settlement Amount”). Class Members are not required to take any action to receive a payment under the
Settlement.
Plan of Distribution to Class Members
A “Class Member” includes all persons who are employed or have been employed by Defendant in California as
“hourly employees” for the period August 1, 2012 through June 3, 2016 (the “Settlement Class” or the “Class
Members”). The Settlement Class does not include any person who previously settled or released any of the claims
covered by this Settlement, or any person who previously was paid or received awards through civil or
administrative actions for the claims covered by this Settlement.
Each Class Member’s Individual Settlement Award will be based on the number of weeks worked by each
participating Class Member according to Zumiez’s records during that time period excluding any weeks which
were covered by any prior settlements.
According to Zumiez’s records, you worked ____ eligible workweeks as a Class Member. Those workweeks
were determined by dividing the total days employed as a Class Member by seven during the Class Period divided
by seven with partial workweeks rounded up. For each workweek, you will receive $____. Your estimated
payment is approximately $_________. This number may change depending on how many Class Members
participate in the Settlement.
If you believe the information provided above as to the number of weeks you worked as a Class Member is
incorrect and wish to dispute it, you must contact the Settlement Administrator at ________________ no later
than 45 days after the date this Notice of Class Action Settlement was mailed to you. If you dispute the
information stated above, the information Zumiez provided to the Settlement Administrator will control unless
you are able to provide documentation that establishes otherwise.
Questions? Contact the Settlement Administrator toll free at 1-___-___-____
Page 2
Class Member Tax Matters
IRS Forms W-2 and 1099 will be distributed to participating Class Members and the appropriate taxing authorities
reflecting the payments Class Members receive under the Settlement. Class Members should consult their tax
advisors concerning the tax consequences of the payments they receive under the Settlement. For purposes of the
Overtime Settlement Class, one third of each Individual Settlement Award shall be allocated as wages for which
IRS Forms W-2 will be issued, one third will be allocated to alleged unpaid penalties for which IRS Forms 1099MISC will be issued, and one third will be allocated as interest for which IRS Forms 1099-MISC will be issued.
Please consult a tax advisor regarding the significance of how each Individual Settlement Award is allocated
among wages, penalties and interest. This notice is not intended to provide legal or tax advice. To the extent this
notice or any of its attachments is interpreted to contain or constitute advice regarding any United States or Federal
tax issue, such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
Your Options Under the Settlement
Option 1 – Participate in the Settlement
If you want to receive your payment from the Settlement, you do not need to do anything further.
If you choose Option 1 and if the Court grants final approval of the Settlement, you will be mailed a check for
your share of the Settlement funds.
In addition, you will be deemed to have released or waived the following claims if you receive your share of the
Settlement funds as a member of the Settlement Class (“Released Claims):
All claims for (1) alleged failure to pay reporting time pay under 8 CCR § 11070(5); Labor Code
§ 558; (2) failure to pay minimum wage under Labor Code §§ 1182.11, 1182.12, 1194, 1194,
1194.2, 1197, and Industrial Welfare Commission (“IWC” Order No. 5-2001); (3) failure to
maintain required business records under Labor Code §§ 1174, 1174.5, and the applicable Wage
Order; (4) failure to provide accurate and itemized wage statements under Labor Code §§ 226,
226.3; (5) failure to pay all wages earned upon termination under Labor Code §§ 200-203; (6)
failure to reimburse business expenses under Labor Code § 2802; (7) violation of Business &
Professions Code section 17200 et seq. including, but not limited to, all claims for unfair, unlawful
and harmful conduct to class members, the general public and Defendant’s competitors and claims
of unlawfully gaining an unfair advantage over other businesses; and (8) PAGA claims for civil
penalties due to any Labor Code violations by Defendant including, but not limited to, Labor Code
sections 201, 202, 203, 204, 210, 226, 226.3, 226.7, 510, 512, 558, 1174, 1174.5, 1194, 1194.2,
1197, 1197.1, 1198, 1199, 2800 and 2802, and Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order No.
5-2001; (9) interest; and (10) attorneys’ fees and costs.
Option 2 – Opt Out of the Settlement
If you do not wish to participate in the Settlement and you do not wish to receive any settlement payment, you
may exclude yourself from participating by submitting a written request to be excluded from the class, to the
Questions? Contact the Settlement Administrator toll free at 1-___-___-____
Page 3
Settlement Administrator. Your written request must expressly and clearly indicate that you have received this
Notice of Class Action Settlement, you do not want to participate in the Settlement, and you desire to be excluded
from the Settlement. The written request for exclusion must include your name, address, telephone number, and
last four digits of your Social Security Number. Sign, date, and mail your written request for exclusion by U.S.
First-Class Mail or equivalent, to the address below.
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE ZIP
The written request to be excluded from the Settlement must be postmarked to the Settlement Administrator not
later than [45 days after mailing date]. If you submit a request for exclusion which is postmarked after [45 days
after mailing date], your request for exclusion will be rejected, and you will be included in the Settlement class.
If you choose Option 2, you will no longer be a Class Member. Therefore, you (1) will not receive any payment
from the Settlement, (2) will not be deemed to have released any claims due to this Settlement, and
(3) will be barred from filing an objection to the Settlement.
Option 3 – File an Objection to the Settlement
If you wish to object to the Settlement because you find it unfair or unreasonable, you may file an objection in
writing stating why you object to the Settlement. Your objection must provide: your full name, address and
telephone number, the last four digits of your Social Security Number, the dates you were employed as an hourly
employee by Zumiez in California, and your objections to the Settlement including each specific reason in support
of each objection and any legal support for each objection. Your objection must be mailed to the Settlement
Administrator at the address listed below:
All objections must be mailed to the Settlement Administrator not later than [45 days after mailing of notice].
Late objections will not be considered. By mailing an objection, you are not excluding yourself from the
Settlement. To exclude yourself from the Settlement, you must follow the directions described above in Option
2. Please note that you cannot both object to the Settlement and exclude yourself. You must choose one option
only.
You may, if you wish, also appear at the Final Fairness and Approval Hearing set for ________________ at
_______ __.m. in Courtroom 2, 15th Floor, of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, located
at 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814, and discuss your objections with the Court and the
Parties at your own expense. You may also retain an attorney to represent you at the Hearing at your own expense.
Additional Information
This Notice of Class Action Settlement is only a summary of this case and the Settlement. For a more detailed
statement of the matters involved in this case and the Settlement, you may refer to the pleadings, the
Joint Stipulation of Settlement, and other papers filed in this case, which may be inspected at the Office of the
Questions? Contact the Settlement Administrator toll free at 1-___-___-____
Page 4
Clerk of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, located at 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento,
California 95814, during regular business hours of each court day.
All inquiries by Class Members regarding this Notice of Class Action Settlement and/or the Settlement should be
directed to the Settlement Administrator or Class Counsel.
PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE CLERK OF THE COURT, THE JUDGE,
ZUMIEZ, OR ZUMIEZ’S ATTORNEYS WITH INQUIRIES.
4873-1242-9322, v. 1
Questions? Contact the Settlement Administrator toll free at 1-___-___-____
Page 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?