Howell v. Beckley

Filing 8

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/15/16 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court Assign a district court judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRESTON ALONZO HOWELL, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-1812 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND RONALD A. BECKLEY, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 17 On August 8, 2016, petitioner was ordered to file a request to proceed in forma pauperis 18 or pay the filing fee for this action within thirty days. Petitioner was warned that failure to 19 comply with that order would result in dismissal. The thirty day period has now expired, and 20 petitioner has not complied with the court’s order. 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court Assign a district court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 27 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 28 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 1 1 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 2 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: September 15, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 howe1812.fifp 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?