Keeton v. Royals
Filing
10
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/15/16 ORDERING that the Clerk randomly assign this case to a United States District Judge. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CANDICE KEETON,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-1820-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
ROYALS,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On August 12, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to, within 30 days, submit either
19
the filing fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis required by § 1915(a). That order
20
warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation of
21
dismissal. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not submitted the filing fee or an
22
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
23
24
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign this case to a United
States District Judge.
25
Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
26
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
27
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
28
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
1
1
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
2
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
3
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
4
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
5
appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez
6
v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
7
DATED: September 15, 2016.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?