California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Masonite Corporation et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/15/2017 ORDERING the Defendants' responsive pleadings are EXTENDED to 8/1/2017; the Initial Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to 9/14/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Michael R. Lozeau (State Bar No. 142893)
Douglas J. Chermak (State Bar No. 233382)
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
410 12th Street, Suite 250
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: (510) 836-4200
Fax: (510) 836-4205
E-mail: michael@lozeaudrury.com
doug@lozeaudrury.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit
corporation,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
v.
MASONITE CORPORATION, a
corporation; SIERRA LUMBER
MANUFACTURERS, a corporation,
17
Case No. 2:16-cv-01833-WBS-AC
ORDER EXTENDING RESPONSIVE
PLEADING AND PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE
Date:
Time:
Judge:
July 31, 2017
1:30 p.m.
Hon. William B. Shubb
Defendants.
18
19
20
Pursuant to the joint stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing, the request to
21
extend the deadline for Defendants’ responsive pleading and the Pretrial Scheduling Status
22
Conference is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendants’ responsive pleading is hereby extended
23
by forty-five (45) days, from June 17, 2017, to August 1, 2017. The Pretrial Scheduling Status
24
Conference is hereby extended by forty-five (45) days, from July 31, 2017, to September 14,
25
2017.
26
///
27
///
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND STATUS CONFERENCE
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: June 15, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND STATUS CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?