California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Masonite Corporation et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/28/2017 CONTINUING the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference to 10/23/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; ORDERING the parties to file a Joint Status Report by 10/10/2017. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Michael R. Lozeau (State Bar No. 142893)
Douglas J. Chermak (State Bar No. 233382)
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
410 12th Street, Suite 250
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: (510) 836-4200
Fax: (510) 836-4205
E-mail: michael@lozeaudrury.com
doug@lozeaudrury.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit
corporation,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
v.
MASONITE CORPORATION, a
corporation; SIERRA LUMBER
MANUFACTURERS, a corporation,
17
Case No. 2:16-cv-01833-WBS-AC
ORDER EXTENDING RESPONSIVE
PLEADING AND PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE
Date:
Time:
Judge:
September 11, 2017
1:30 p.m.
Hon. William B. Shubb
Defendants.
18
19
20
Pursuant to the joint stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing, the request to
21
extend the deadline for Defendants’ responsive pleading and the Pretrial Scheduling Status
22
Conference is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendants’ responsive pleading is hereby extended
23
by thirty (30) days, from August 1, 2017 to August 31, 2017. The Pretrial Scheduling Status
24
Conference is hereby extended by thirty (30) days, from September 11, 2017 to October 23, 2017
25
at 1:30 p.m. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than October 10, 2017.
26
///
27
///
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND STATUS CONFERENCE
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: July 28, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND STATUS CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?