Ramos v. AM Retail Group, Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/16/2016 ORDERING that defendant's deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint is hereby EXTENDED until 10/6/2016. (Zignago, K.)

1 SEDGWICK LLP
STEPHANIE A. SHERIDAN, State Bar No. 135910
2 [e-mail]
ANTHONY J. ANSCOMBE, State Bar No. 135883
3 [e-mail]
MEEGAN B. BROOKS, State Bar No. 298570
4 [e-mail]
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
5 San Francisco, CA 94104-2834
Telephone: [phone]
6 Facsimile: 415.781.2635
7 Attorneys for Defendant
AM Retail Group, Inc.
8
Gene J. Stonebarger, State Bar No. 209461
9 Richard D. Lambert, State Bar No. 251148
STONEBARGER LAW
10 A Professional Corporation
11 75 Iron Point Circle, Ste. 145
Folsom, CA 95630
12 Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
13
Thomas A. Kearney, State Bar No. 90045
14 Prescott W. Littlefield, State Bar No. 259049
KEARNEY LITTLEFIELD LLP
15 3436 N. Verdugo Rd, Suite 230
16 Glendale, AA 91208
Telephone [phone]
17 Facsimile (2l3) 473-1919
18 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Maria Ramos
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21

22 MARIA RAMOS, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated,
23
Plaintiff,
24
v.
25
AM RETAIL GROUP, INC., a Delaware
26 Corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive,
27

Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01842-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT; ORDER
FAC Filed: Sept. 6, 2016
Current Response Date: Sept. 23, 2016
New Response Date: Oct. 6, 2016

28
83745523V2

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01842-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

Plaintiff Maria Ramos (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AM Retail Group, Inc. (“Defendant” or

2 AMRG), by and through their attorneys of record herein, hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to
3 Local Rule 143 that Defendant shall have until October 6, 2016 to respond to Plaintiff’s First
4 Amended Complaint (“FAC”).
5

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the FAC on September 6, 2016, making AMRG’s response

6 deadline September 23, 2016;
7

WHEREAS, Good cause exists for this extension, as AMRG requires additional time to

8 investigate the claims in the FAC and to prepare its response;
9

THEREFORE Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and

10 agree that Defendant may have up to and including October 6, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to
11 the FAC filed in this action.
12

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

13 DATED: August 9, 2016

SEDGWICK LLP

14

By: /s/ Stephanie A. Sheridan*
Stephanie A. Sheridan
Attorneys for Defendant
AM RETAIL GROUP, INC.

15
16
17

DATED: August 9, 2016

By: /s/ Richard D. Lambert (as authorized on 9/9/16)
Richard D. Lambert
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARIA RAMOS

18
19
20
21

STONEBARGER LAW

*Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), I attest that that Plaintiff’s counsel concurs in this filing’s
content and has authorized the filing.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

83745523V2

-2-

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01842-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
2

ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause shown, Defendant’s deadline to respond

3 to the First Amended Complaint is hereby extended until October 6, 2016.
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 Dated: September 16, 2016
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

83745523V2

-3-

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01842-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT