Mann, Sr. et al v. City of Sacramento

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/27/16 ORDERING that, pursuant to 18 Stipulation, the Court ALLOWS plaintiff to file a Third Amended Complaint within 10 days; defendants shall file their responsive pleading within 21 days of the filing of the Third Amended Complaint. (Benson, A)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

WILLIAM MANN SR., Successor-inInterest to Decedent JOSEPH MANN, by
and through his Power of Attorney
ROBERT MANN; ROBERT MANN,
individually; DEBORAH MANN,
individually; VERNADINE MANN,
individually; WILLIAM MANN JR,
individually,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case: 2:16-cv-01847
ORDER

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal
corporation; JOHN TENNIS, in his
individual and official capacity as Police
Officer for the CITY OF
SACRAMENTO; RANDY LOZOYA, in
his individual and official capacity as
Police Officer for the CITY OF
SACRAMENTO; and DOES 1-50,
inclusive, individually and in their official
capacity as police officers for the City of
Sacramento,
Defendants.

17

.
18
19
20

Good cause having been shown, the COURT allows Plaintiff to file a Third Amended

21

Complaint within 10 days of the date of this Order. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading

22

Within 21 days of the filing of the Third Amended Complaint.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated: December 27, 2016
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT