Mann, Sr. et al v. City of Sacramento
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/27/16 ORDERING that, pursuant to 18 Stipulation, the Court ALLOWS plaintiff to file a Third Amended Complaint within 10 days; defendants shall file their responsive pleading within 21 days of the filing of the Third Amended Complaint. (Benson, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM MANN SR., Successor-inInterest to Decedent JOSEPH MANN, by
and through his Power of Attorney
ROBERT MANN; ROBERT MANN,
individually; DEBORAH MANN,
individually; VERNADINE MANN,
individually; WILLIAM MANN JR,
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal
corporation; JOHN TENNIS, in his
individual and official capacity as Police
Officer for the CITY OF
SACRAMENTO; RANDY LOZOYA, in
his individual and official capacity as
Police Officer for the CITY OF
SACRAMENTO; and DOES 1-50,
inclusive, individually and in their official
capacity as police officers for the City of
Good cause having been shown, the COURT allows Plaintiff to file a Third Amended
Complaint within 10 days of the date of this Order. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading
Within 21 days of the filing of the Third Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 27, 2016
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?