Mann, Sr. et al v. City of Sacramento

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/17/17: This action is related with member case 2:17-CV-01201 KJM CKD. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 13 14 15 WILLIAM MANN, SR., Successorin—Interest to Decedent JOSEPH MANN; ROBERT MANN, individually; DEBORAH MANN, individually; VERNADINE MURPHY MANN, individually; and WILLIAM MANN, JR., individually; 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal corporation; JOHN TENNIS, in his individual and official capacity as Police Officer for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO; RANDY LOZOYA, in his individual and official capacity as Police Officer for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, individually and in their official capacity as Police Officers for the City of Sacramento; Defendants, _______________________________ 27 28 1 NO. 2:16-CV-01847 WBS DB 1 2 3 ROBERT MANN SR., VERN MURPHYMAN, DEBORAH MANN, ZACHARY MANN, and WILLIAM MANN, Plaintiffs, 4 5 6 7 8 NO. 2:17-CV-01201 KJM CKD v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAMUEL D. SOMERS JR., JOHN C. TENNIS, AND RANDY R. LOZOYA, Defendants. 9 10 11 ----oo0oo---- 12 Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that 13 14 they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), because 15 both cases arise from the alleged shooting of decedent Joseph 16 Mann by defendants John Tennis and Randy Lozoya, police officers 17 of defendant City of Sacramento. 18 the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial 19 saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for 20 the parties. Accordingly, the assignment of The parties should be aware that relating the cases 21 22 under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are 23 assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is 24 effected. 25 cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to 26 whom the first filed action was assigned. 27 28 Under the regular practice of this court, related IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated Mann v. City of Sacramento, No. 2:16-CV-1847 WBS DB, and Mann v. 2 1 City of Sacramento, No. 2:17-CV-1201 KJM CKD, be, and the same 2 hereby are, deemed related. 3 Sacramento, No. 2:17-CV-1201 KJM CKD, shall be reassigned to the 4 Honorable WILLIAM B. SHUBB. 5 reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. 6 captions on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown 7 as Mann v. City of Sacramento, No. 2:17-CV-1201 WBS DB. 8 9 The case denominated Mann v. City of Any dates currently set in the Henceforth, the IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make an appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases to 10 compensate for this reassignment. 11 Dated: July 17, 2017 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?