Mikesell v. Commisioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/26/2018 DIRECTING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 10 days of the date of this order, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to inform the court regarding consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, as required by the court's scheduling order. Submission of a completed consent election form shall constitute a sufficient response. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHELLY MONIQUE MIKESELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-CV-1850-CMK vs. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 / 17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 19 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. 20 A review of the docket reflects that defendant has notified the court regarding consent to proceed 21 before a Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, however, has not notified the court regarding consent. 22 Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order and Eastern District of California Local Rules, Appendix 23 A, the time to do so has now expired. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 1 Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 10 days of the date of this order, why 2 sanctions should not be imposed for failure to inform the court regarding consent to Magistrate 3 Judge jurisdiction, as required by the court’s scheduling order. Submission of a completed 4 consent election form shall constitute a sufficient response. The Clerk of the Court is directed 5 to serve on plaintiff a copy of the court’s form entitled “Consent to Assignment or Request for 6 Reassignment.” 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 DATED: April 26, 2018 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?