Lacey v. Taylor

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/21/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RONNIE STERLING LACY,

12
13
14

No. 2:16-cv-1859 CKD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

T. TAYLOR, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On March 27, 2017, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to file a

18

second amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a second amended complaint

19

would result in dismissal. The time for filing a second amended complaint has expired, and

20

plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. Plaintiff has consented to this court’s

21

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 302.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

23

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

Dated: June 21, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1
lacy1859.fta