Lacey v. Taylor

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/21/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONNIE STERLING LACY, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-1859 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. TAYLOR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On March 27, 2017, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to file a 18 second amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a second amended complaint 19 would result in dismissal. The time for filing a second amended complaint has expired, and 20 plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. Plaintiff has consented to this court’s 21 jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 302. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 23 See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 Dated: June 21, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1 lacy1859.fta

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?