Brown v. Rafferty

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/30/17 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAMION BROWN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-1873 CKD P v. ORDER C/O W. RAFFERTY, 15 Defendant. 16 By order filed September 22, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was 17 18 granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff was advised that 19 failure to amend would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) Subsequently, plaintiff was granted a 30-day extension of time to file an amended 20 21 complaint (ECF No. 15), followed by a 45-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. 22 (ECF No. 18.) Both periods have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 23 Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this action. 24 (ECF No. 9.) 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 2 See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 Dated: January 30, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 / brow1873.fta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?