Brown v. Rafferty

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/30/17 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAMION BROWN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-1873 CKD P

v.

ORDER

C/O W. RAFFERTY,

15

Defendant.

16
By order filed September 22, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was

17
18

granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff was advised that

19

failure to amend would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.)
Subsequently, plaintiff was granted a 30-day extension of time to file an amended

20
21

complaint (ECF No. 15), followed by a 45-day extension of time to file an amended complaint.

22

(ECF No. 18.) Both periods have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

23

Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this action.

24

(ECF No. 9.)

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

2

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

3

Dated: January 30, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

2 / brow1873.fta

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2