Miller Marital Deduction Trust et al v. Estate Of Mark B. Dubois, et al

Filing 67

ORDER signed by District Judge Stanley A Bastian on 2/9/2018 ORDERING the hearing on 63 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is VACATED and RESET to 3/21/2018 without oral argument. If the Court determines oral argument is required, it shall contact the parties to schedule a hearing. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 AT SACRAMENTO 9 10 MILLER MARITAL DEDUCTION No. 2:16-cv-01883-SB 11 TRUST, by and through its trustees, Helen 12 Miller and James Morris; and HELEN ORDER RESETTING MOTION 13 MILLER, an individual, HEARING Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 ESTATE OF MARK B. DUBOIS, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Currently pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motions for Summary 19 Judgement, ECF Nos. 61 and 62; and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 20 ECF No. 63. The Court informs the parties that it shall address these motions by 21 consolidated hearing on March 21, 2018, without oral argument. Thus, the hearing 22 for Plaintiffs’ motion, currently set for hearing on February 28, 2018, shall be 23 vacated and reset to March 21, 2018. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // ORDER RESETTING MOTION HEARING ^ 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 3 63, is VACATED and RESET to March 21, 2018 without oral argument. If the 4 Court determines oral argument is required, it shall contact the parties to schedule a 5 hearing. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is hereby directed to enter 7 this Order and provide copies to counsel. 8 DATED this 9th day of February 2018. 9 10 11 _______________________________ Stanley A. Bastian United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RESETTING MOTION HEARING ^ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?