Henson v. Griem

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/18/16 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall strike the amended petition (ECF No. 5 ) from the docket. Within 30 days, petitioner shall file a signed petition using the form employed by this court and stating all claims and prayers for relief. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to file a signed petition pursuant to this order may result in the dismissal of this action. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN HENSON, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-1908-EFB P v. ORDER DARREN GRIEM, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner proceeds without counsel and seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 17 18 U.S.C. § 2254. He has paid the filing fee. However, the court cannot the required review of the 19 amended petition because petitioner has not signed it. See ECF No. 5 at 20. Rule 11 of the 20 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper . 21 . . be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name—or by a party personally if 22 the party is unrepresented.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Because petitioner is not represented by 23 counsel and did not sign the petition himself, it will be disregarded. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The Clerk of the Court shall strike the amended petition (ECF No. 5) from the docket. 26 2. Within thirty days, petitioner shall file a signed petition using the form employed by this court and stating all claims and prayers for relief. 27 28 ///// 1 1 2 3 3. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to file a signed petition pursuant to this order may result in the dismissal of this action. DATED: August 18, 2016. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?