Parker v. Sacramento County Police Department et al.
Filing
8
ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/16 ORDERING that within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the Clerk $100.00 in monetary sanctions for failure to comply with the court's order. W ithin 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) based on plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's order and failure to prosecute the case. Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint in compliance with the court's 10/12/2016 order. Alternatively, and in lieu of paying the monetary sanctions, responding to the order t o show cause, and filing a first amended complaint, plaintiff may instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice within 21 days of this order. Failure to comply with all terms of this order will result in dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
AKIKA PARKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-1926-GEB-KJN PS
v.
ORDER AND
SACRAMENTO COUNTY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendants.
17
Plaintiff Akika Parker, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action on August 15,
18
19
2016. (ECF No. 1.)1 On October 12, 2016, the court granted plaintiff’s amended motion to
20
proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed her complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 5.)
21
Plaintiff was given 28 days to file either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal
22
of the action. (Id.) Additionally, plaintiff was expressly cautioned that failure to file either an
23
amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal by the required deadline may result in
24
dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Id.)
25
Although the applicable deadline has now passed, the court’s records show that plaintiff failed to
26
file either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal as ordered.
27
28
1
This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21).
1
1
The court has considered whether the action should be dismissed at this juncture.
2
Nevertheless, in light of plaintiff’s pro se status, and the court’s desire to resolve the action on the
3
merits, the court first attempts lesser sanctions by issuing an order to show cause and imposing
4
monetary sanctions. Given that plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the amount of monetary
5
sanctions imposed is necessarily minimal.
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
7
1. Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the Clerk of Court $100.00 in
8
9
monetary sanctions for failure to comply with the court’s order.
2. Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action
10
should not be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
11
41(b) based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order and failure to
12
prosecute the case.
13
14
3. Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint in
compliance with the court’ s October 12, 2016 order.
15
4. Alternatively, and in lieu of paying the monetary sanctions, responding to the order to
16
show cause, and filing a first amended complaint, plaintiff may instead file a notice of
17
voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice within 21 days of this order.
18
19
20
21
5. Failure to comply with all terms of this order will result in dismissal of the action with
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 22, 2016
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?