Martin v. Foulk et al
Filing
19
ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/11/2017 ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief. The ADA/Armstrong claims are DISMISSED without leave to amend and Defendants Stainer and Foulk are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BEN ORLANDO MARTIN,
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-1929-GEB-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
FRED FOULK, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On October 13, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 13, 2017, are adopted in full;
28
2. Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief is denied;
1
1
3. The ADA/Armstrong claims are dismissed without leave to amend; and
2
4. Defendants Stainer and Foulk are dismissed without leave to amend.
3
Dated: December 11, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?