Martin v. Foulk et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/19/16 ORDERING that the court's August 18, 2016 order (ECF No. 3 ) is VACATED. In duecourt, the court will issue a screening order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and rule on plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BEN ORLANDO MARTIN,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-1929-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

FRED FOULK, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. On August 18, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to submit either the filing fee or

19

the in forma pauperis application required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 3. On the same day,

20

plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was entered on the court’s docket.

21

ECF No. 4. Accordingly, the court’s August 18, 2016 order (ECF No. 3) is vacated. In due

22

court, the court will issue a screening order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and rule on plaintiff’s

23

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

24

So ordered.

25

Dated: August 19, 2016.

26
27
28