Kessler v. Sacramento City Police Department et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 19 Motion for Extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/17/17: The November 1, 2017 deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendant's motion for terminating sanctions 17 is reset to December 6, 2017. Defendant's reply brief is due December 13, 2017. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

WESLEY WILLIAM KESSLER,

11

Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

No. 2:16-cv-01930-GEB-AC

v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al,
Defendants.

15
16
17

The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time. ECF No. 19.

18

Plaintiff is incarcerated. Id. at 1. Plaintiff’s motion asks for a general extension of “all deadlines

19

or scheduled dates” due to plaintiff’s alleged difficulty accessing the law library. Id. at 2. While

20

the court does not give general extensions, the court construes plaintiff’s motion as a request for

21

an extension of the only pending deadline in this case, which is the deadline to respond to

22

defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions. ECF No. 17. Plaintiff’s deadline to respond,

23

which is currently set for November 1, 2017, will be extended to December 6, 2017.

24

The court hereby ORDERS:

25

1. The November 1, 2017 deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendant’s motion for
terminating sanctions (ECF No. 17) is reset to December 6, 2017;

26

2. Defendant’s reply brief is due December 13, 2017; and

27
28

////
1

1
2
3
4

3. If plaintiff does not file any statement in response to defendant’s motion, the court will
construe plaintiff’s lack of response as non-opposition to defendant’s motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 17, 2017

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2