Kessler v. Sacramento City Police Department et al

Filing 28

ORDER denying second Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/30/17. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WESLEY WILLIAM KESSLER,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:16-cv-01930-GEB-AC

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al,
Defendants.

17
18

The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s second motion to appoint counsel. ECF No. 27.

19

Plaintiff is incarcerated, and is bringing his civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as a self-

20

represented litigant proceeding in forma pauperis. ECF No. 1, 2, 5 and 20.

21

Plaintiff filed an initial motion to appoint counsel, which was denied by this court. ECF

22

Nos. 20 and 22. Plaintiff’s second motion does not provide any information that alters this

23

court’s previous analysis. Compare ECF Nos. 20 and 27. Plaintiff’s second motion to appoint

24

counsel (ECF No. 27) is DENIED.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 30, 2017