Kessler v. Sacramento City Police Department et al

Filing 28

ORDER denying second Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/30/17. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WESLEY WILLIAM KESSLER, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:16-cv-01930-GEB-AC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al, Defendants. 17 18 The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s second motion to appoint counsel. ECF No. 27. 19 Plaintiff is incarcerated, and is bringing his civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as a self- 20 represented litigant proceeding in forma pauperis. ECF No. 1, 2, 5 and 20. 21 Plaintiff filed an initial motion to appoint counsel, which was denied by this court. ECF 22 Nos. 20 and 22. Plaintiff’s second motion does not provide any information that alters this 23 court’s previous analysis. Compare ECF Nos. 20 and 27. Plaintiff’s second motion to appoint 24 counsel (ECF No. 27) is DENIED. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 30, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?