Ramos v. Williams Unified School District
Filing
28
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/14/2018 APPROVING 27 Stipulation for Independent Mental Examination. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
James K. Ward, Esq. (SBN 117639)
Eric R. Garner, Esq. (SBN 131232)
EVANS, WIECKOWSKI, WARD &
SCOFFIELD, LLP
745 University Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916)923-1600
Facsimile: (916)923-1616
Attorneys for Defendants
Williams Unified School District; Judith Rossi
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
) Case No. 2:16-cv-01941-JAM-EFB
)
) STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES
Plaintiff,
) REGARDING INDEPENDENT MENTAL
) EXAMINATION; ORDER
vs.
)
WILLIAMS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; )
)
Judith Ross, as an individual, and DOES 1
)
through 20,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff, Armando Ramos by and
ARMANDO RAMOS,
20
21
through his attorney of record and Defendant, Williams Unified School District and Judith Rossi,
22
through their attorneys of record that Armando Ramos will submit to an independent mental
23
examination to be performed as follows:
24
(1) Dr. Ronald H. Roberts, Ph.D., ABPD on March 30, 2018, starting at 10:00 a.m. at
25
M.O.A. Deposition Reporters, 855 Harter Parkway, Ste. 210, Yuba City, CA 95993;
26
27
The examination to be performed by Dr. Roberts will consist of psychological testing. It
28
is anticipated the duration of the psychological testing will take approximately four (4) hours,
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES REGARDING INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAMINATION - 1
1
2
3
4
excluding appropriate breaks. Additional time will be allowed, as needed, only to facilitate any
needed rest breaks; and
(2) Dr. Charles Saldanha, MD, on April 13, 2018 at 10:00 a.m., at M.O.A. Deposition
Reporters, 855 Harter Parkway, Ste. 210, Yuba City, CA 95993, will conduct a detailed
5
psychiatric interview lasting approximately five (5) hours. Additional time will be allowed, as
6
7
needed, only to facilitate any needed rest break.
8
Dr. Roberts’ and Dr. Saldanha’s resumes are attached hereto.
9
No attorneys or other third parties shall be present during the testing and interview with
10
Armando Ramos.
The psychiatric interview will be recorded by audio and copies of the
11
interview made available to both parties.
Plaintiff Armando Ramos may also record the
12
13
examination. It is agreed the interview is not for purposes of collecting factual information to
14
defend liability in this case and that it is exclusively to evaluate Plaintiff Armando Ramos’
15
emotional and psychiatric state, third party rights of privacy will be maintained.
16
The total time spent testing and interviewing Armando Ramos will likely be no more than
17
18
19
20
21
10-12 hours.
Plaintiff will obtain, via authorizations signed by Armando Ramos, the following
categories of documents:
1.
VA records; and
22
2.
The documents responsive to the Subpoena served on Greene and Roberts.
23
Upon production of the above-referenced documents Plaintiff will produce all of them
24
except those that Plaintiff contends are privileged. As to privileged documents, Plaintiff agrees
25
26
to prepare and serve a privilege log by March 23, 2018. The parties will then meet and confer
27
about the documents over which there is disagreement. Absent resolution, the parties agree to
28
submit the issue to the court.
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES REGARDING INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAMINATION - 2
1
2
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 14, 2018
LAW OFFICES OF JILL P. TELFER
4
/s/ Jill P. Telfer
________________________________
JILL P. TELFER
Attorney for Plaintiff
ARMANDO RAMOS
5
6
7
8
9
10
Dated: March 14, 2018
EVANS, WIECKOWSKI, WARD &
SCOFFIELD, LLP
11
12
/s/ James K. Ward
_____________________________
JAMES K. WARD
ERIC R. GARNER
Attorneys for Defendant
WILLIAMS UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT
13
14
15
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
DATED: March 14, 2018.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES REGARDING INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAMINATION - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?