Keel v. Foulk et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/24/22 ADOPTING 64 Findings and Recommendations in full DISMISSING Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICKY RAY KEEL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-01946-TLN-JDP

v.

ORDER

PINE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On December 3, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20
21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 64.) No

23

objections were filed.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 3, 2021, (ECF No. 64), are adopted

27
28

in full;
1

1

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, (ECF No. 51), is GRANTED;

2

3. Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim is dismissed without leave to amend; and

3

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

4

DATED: January 24, 2022

5
6
7
8

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2