Gibbs v. Shasta County
Filing
14
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/30/2016 ORDERING that the 13 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Petitioner's 10 motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(b), is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
ROBERT ALAN GIBBS,
6
7
8
No. 2:16-cv-1958 JAM GGH P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
SHASTA COUNTY,
9
Respondent.
10
11
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
12
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
13
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
14
On October 27, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
15
which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to
16
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 13. Petitioner
17
has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
18
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
19
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED that:
21
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 27, 2016, are adopted in full; and
22
2. Petitioner’s filing, (ECF No. 10), construed as a motion for relief from judgment
23
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(b), is denied.
24
DATED: November 30, 2016
25
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?