Hearne v. Baughman et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/3/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHNNY HEARNE,
12
No. 2:16-cv-1996 DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER
14
DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.
17
18
§1983. In an order filed October 12, 2016, plaintiff was informed that he must pay the filing fee
19
for this action or file a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No.
20
5.) Plaintiff was told that his failure to pay the fee or file the application within thirty days would
21
result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Plaintiff failed to respond in any way to the
22
October 12 order.
In an order filed November 23, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this case
23
24
should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the October 12 order. (ECF No. 6.)
25
Plaintiff was informed that his failure to show cause within twenty days would result in dismissal
26
of this case without prejudice.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee, file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or
2
otherwise respond to the court’s October 12 and November 23, 2016 orders. Accordingly, IT IS
3
HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b);
4
E.D. Cal. R. 110.
5
Dated: January 3, 2017
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/hear1996.final
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?