Hearne v. Baughman et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/3/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHNNY HEARNE, 12 No. 2:16-cv-1996 DB P Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 17 18 §1983. In an order filed October 12, 2016, plaintiff was informed that he must pay the filing fee 19 for this action or file a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 20 5.) Plaintiff was told that his failure to pay the fee or file the application within thirty days would 21 result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Plaintiff failed to respond in any way to the 22 October 12 order. In an order filed November 23, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this case 23 24 should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the October 12 order. (ECF No. 6.) 25 Plaintiff was informed that his failure to show cause within twenty days would result in dismissal 26 of this case without prejudice. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee, file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or 2 otherwise respond to the court’s October 12 and November 23, 2016 orders. Accordingly, IT IS 3 HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 4 E.D. Cal. R. 110. 5 Dated: January 3, 2017 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DLB:9 DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/hear1996.final 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?