Evans v. Fox et al
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/11/2022 GRANTING IN PART 68 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition to 62 Motion to Compel. No further extensions of time will be granted. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GENE E. EVANS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. 2:16-cv-01997-JAM-JDP (PC)
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
v.
ECF No. 68
K. LASSITER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff has filed a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to file an opposition to
17
18
defendants’ motion to compel. Good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:
19
1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 68, is granted in part.
20
2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition
21
to defendants’ motion to compel.
3. No further extensions of time will be granted.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated:
26
27
28
July 11, 2022
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?