King v. Price

Filing 30

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/03/17 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEVIN LYNELL KING,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-1998 KJM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

JEROME PRICE, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

By order filed October 13, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

18

to file an amended complaint was granted. On November 28, 2016, and February 21, 2017,

19

plaintiff was granted extensions of time in which to file an amended complaint. Sixty days from

20

the February 21, 2017 order have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint

21

or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

28

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: May 3, 2017

4
5
king1998.fta.ext

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2