Merriman v. Telander et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/3/17 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 2/21/17 10 are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's MOTION for a Preliminary Injunction 2 is DENIED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINIQUE MERRIMAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2030-JAM-EFB P v. ORDER JAMES TELANDER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 21, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 21, 2017, are adopted in full; and 27 28 ///// 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 2) is denied. 2 3 Dated: May 3, 2017 /s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?