Merriman v. Telander et al
Filing
55
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/2/2018 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Plaintiff's 26 , 29 Motions for Preliminary Injunction are DENIED.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DOMINIQUE MERRIMAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-2030-JAM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
JAMES TELANDER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 3, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
26
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
27
proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 3, 2018, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction (ECF Nos. 26 & 29) is DENIED.
4
So ordered.
5
6
7
8
DATED: July 2, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?