Thomas v. City of Folsom

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/16/2016 ORDERING that the Initial Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to 2/13/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; the parties' Joint Status Report is due on or before 1/30/2017; and the parties shall meet and confer on a discovery plan as required by FRCP 26(f) on or before 1/17/2017. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 David E. Mastagni, Bar No. 204244 Isaac S. Stevens, Bar No. 251245 Ace T. Tate, Bar No. 262015 MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT A Professional Corporation 1912 "I" Street Sacramento, California 95811 Telephone:916.446.4692 Facsimile: 916.447.4614 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 CAROLEE G. KILDUFF, SBN 107232 Email: ckilduff@akk-law.com ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP Attorneys at Law 601 University Avenue, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95825 9 10 11 12 13 Telephone: (916) 564-6100 Telecopier: (916) 564-6263 Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF FOLSOM 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BRIAN THOMAS, on behalf of himself and all ) similarly situated individuals, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF FOLSOM, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-02038-WBS STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES; [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff BRIAN THOMAS (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CITY OF FOLSOM (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: A. WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its complaint on August 25, 2016, and served Defendant on November 17, 2016; -1STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B. WHEREAS, the Court scheduled an initial status (pretrial scheduling) conference for January 3, 2017, and the parties' Joint Status Report is due December 20, 2016. C. WHEREAS, the parties stipulated for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to the complaint, up to and including January 5, 2017. D. WHEREAS, Defendant will not have formally appeared in this case until after the current deadline to file a Joint Status Report and the initial status conference has passed. C. WHEREAS, the parties request additional time to evaluate their respective claims 8 and defenses in order to meaningfully participate in preparation of a joint status report and the 9 initial status conference. 10 NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate that: 11 1. It is in the interest of judicial economy to continue the initial status conference 12 from January 3, 2017, to February 7, 2017. No party will be prejudiced by a continuance of the 13 initial status conference. 14 2. The parties further stipulate that the Joint Status Report be due on or before 15 January 24, 2017. 16 3. The parties agree to meet and confer on a discovery plan as required by FRCP 17 26(f) on or before January 17, 2017. 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 19 20 Dated: December 16, 2016 By:/s/ Carolee G. Kilduff CAROLEE G. KILDUFF Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF FOLSOM 21 22 23 24 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP Dated: December 16, 2016 MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT, APC 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Ace T. Tate DAVID E. MASTAGNI ISAAC S. STEVENS ACE T. TATE Attorneys for Plaintiff -2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES TO THIS CASE, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED THAT: 4 1. 5 1:30 p.m. 6 2. The parties’ Joint Status Report is due on or before January 30, 2017. 7 3. The parties shall meet and confer on a discovery plan as required by FRCP 26(f) on or 8 before January 17, 2017. The initial status conference is continued from January 3, 2017, to February 13, 2017 at 9 10 Dated: December 16, 2016 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?