Koenig v. Marriott International, Inc.

Filing 20

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/12/18 ORDERING that Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and this Court shall retain ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the terms of and compliance with the settlement agreement. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Ian A. Rambarran, Bar No. 227366 Michael W. Carruth, Bar No. 249263 KLINEDINST PC 801 K Street, Suite 2100 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 444-7573/FAX (916) 444-7544 irambarran@klinedinstlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. (sued incorrectly as MARRIOT INTERNATIONAL, INC.) 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 KLINEDINST PC 801 K STREET, SUITE 2100 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LINDA KOENIG, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:16-cv-02050- TLN-DB ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE v. MARRIOT INTERNATIONAL, INC. and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 ORDER 18 19 20 21 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION filed on April 12, 2018, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Linda Koenig’s Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and this Court shall retain ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the terms of and compliance with the settlement agreement. DATED: April 12, 2018 23 24 25 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 26 27 28 -1- ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2:16-cv-02050- TLN-DB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?