Wright v. Macomber et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/10/2018 REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. The parties shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. The assig ned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy within 30 days to schedule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. The Clerk shall serve copies of (a) plaintiff's complaint, (b) the screening order, and (c) the instant order, on Supervising DAG Christopher Becker. (cc: Christopher Becker) (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DOMINIC VA’SHON WRIGHT,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-2054 JAM KJN P

v.
JEFF MACOMBER, et al.,

15

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POSTSCREENING ADR PROJECT AND
STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. The U.S. Marshal has

17
18

accomplished service of process on defendants Macomber, Masterson and Roth.
The undersigned is referring all post-screening civil rights cases filed by pro se inmates to

19
20

the Post-Screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project in an effort to resolve such

21

cases more expeditiously and less expensively. Defense counsel from the Office of the California

22

Attorney General has agreed to participate in this pilot project. No defenses or objections shall be

23

waived by their participation.

24

As set forth in the screening order, plaintiff has stated a potentially cognizable civil rights

25

claim. Thus, the court stays this action for a period of 120 days to allow the parties to investigate

26

plaintiff’s claims, meet and confer, and then participate in a settlement conference.

27

////

28

////
1

1

There is a presumption that all post-screening civil rights cases assigned to the

2

undersigned will proceed to settlement conference.1 However, if after investigating plaintiff’s

3

claims and speaking with plaintiff, and after conferring with defense counsel’s supervisor,

4

defense counsel in good faith finds that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources,

5

defense counsel may move to opt out of this pilot project.

6

By filing the attached notice within thirty days, the parties shall notify the court whether

7

they waive disqualification for the undersigned to hold the settlement conference or whether they

8

request a different judge. Plaintiff shall also indicate his preference to appear in person or by

9

videoconference, if available. Failure to timely file such notice will result in the case being set

10

for settlement conference before a different judge.

11

Within thirty days, the assigned Deputy Attorney General shall contact the Courtroom

12

Deputy, Alexandra Waldrop, at [phone], to schedule the settlement conference. If

13

difficulties arise in scheduling the settlement conference due to the court’s calendar, the parties

14

may seek an extension of the initial 120 day stay.

15

Once the settlement conference is scheduled, at least seven days prior to conference, the

16

parties shall submit to the assigned settlement judge a confidential settlement conference

17

statement. The parties’ confidential settlement conference statement shall include the following:

18

(a) names and locations of the parties; (b) a short statement of the facts and alleged damages; (c) a

19

short procedural history; (d) an analysis of the risk of liability, including a discussion of the

20

efforts made to investigate the allegations; and (e) a discussion of the efforts that have been made

21

to settle the case.

22

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

23

1. This action is stayed for 120 days to allow the parties an opportunity to settle their

24

dispute before a responsive pleading is filed, or the discovery process begins. Except as provided

25

herein or by subsequent court order, no other pleadings or other documents may be filed in this

26

case during the stay of this action. The parties shall not engage in formal discovery, but the

27
28

1

If the case does not settle, the court will set a date for the filing of a responsive pleading at the
conference.
2

1
2

parties may elect to engage in informal discovery.
2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, the parties shall file the attached notice,

3

informing the court whether they waive disqualification for the undersigned to hold the settlement

4

conference, or whether they choose to have the settlement conference held by a different judge.

5

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, the assigned Deputy Attorney General

6

shall contact this court’s Courtroom Deputy, Alexandra Waldrop, at [phone], to schedule

7

the settlement conference.

8

4. At least seven days prior to the settlement conference, each party shall submit a

9

confidential settlement conference statement, as described above, to the judge assigned for

10
11
12
13

settlement.
5. If a settlement is reached at any point during the stay of this action, the parties shall file
a Notice of Settlement in accordance with Local Rule 160.
6. The Clerk of the Court shall serve copies of (a) plaintiff’s amended complaint (ECF

14

No. 23), (b) the screening order (ECF No. 25), and (c) the instant order, on Supervising Deputy

15

Attorney General Christopher Becker.

16

7. The parties remain obligated to keep the court informed of their current address at all

17

times during the stay and while the action is pending. Any change of address must be reported

18

promptly to the court in a separate document captioned for this case and entitled “Notice of

19

Change of Address.” See L.R. 182(f).

20

Dated: August 10, 2018

21
22
23
24

wrig2054.adr.post.usm.kjn

25
26
27
28
3

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

DOMINIC VA’SHON WRIGHT,

7
8
9

No. 2:16-cv-2054 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.
JEFF MACOMBER, et al.,

10

NOTICE RE: JUDGE ELECTION FOR
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (POSTSCREENING ADR PROJECT)

Defendants.

11
12
13

1. As required by court order, the parties notify the court of the following election:
____ Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b) of the Eastern District of California, the party signing

14

below affirmatively requests that the assigned Magistrate Judge participate in the settlement

15

conference and, further, waives any claim of disqualification of the assigned Magistrate Judge on

16

that basis thereafter. This waiver is not to be construed as consent to the Magistrate Judge’s

17

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

18
19
20
21

OR
____ The party signing below requests that a different judge hold the settlement
conference.
AND
2. Plaintiff indicates his preference by checking one:

22
_____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference in person.
23
OR
24
_____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference by video conference.
25
26

DATED:

27

________________________________
Plaintiff or Counsel for Defendants

28
1