Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/28/2018 ORDERING that Plaintiff, Natashia Thomas, be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $5,000.00 under the EAJA. (Fabillaran, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Robert C Weems (CA SBN 148156) WEEMS LAW OFFICES 769 Center Blvd., PMB 38 Fairfax, CA 94930 Ph: 415.881.7653 Fx: 866.610.1430 rcweems@weemslawoffices.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, NATASHIA THOMAS MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN 230138 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration ARMAND ROTH, CSBN 214624 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8924 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: armand.roth@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant, NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NATASHIA THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:16-cv-2060 DB STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ATTORNEYS FEES NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 25 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, 26 subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff, NATASHIA THOMAS, be awarded attorney fees 27 in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars and no cents ($5,000.00) under the Equal Access to Justice 28 Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services STIPULATION 1 No. 2:16-cv-2060 DB 1 rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 2 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). 3 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider (i) 4 Plaintiff’s assignment to counsel, Robert C. Weems. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 5 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any 6 offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order 7 for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 8 9 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to be 10 made directly to Robert Weems, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments 11 made shall be delivered to counsel, Robert Weems. 12 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees 13 and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or 14 otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any 15 and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Robert Weems including Weems Law Offices may have relating 16 to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 17 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Robert Weems and/or Weems Law Offices to 18 seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause 19 provisions of the EAJA. 20 21 SO STIPULATED AND AGREED: 22 23 Dated: June 28, 2018 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN 230138 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration ARMAND ROTH, CSBN 214624 Special Assistant United States Attorney 24 25 26 27 /s/Armand Roth ARMAND ROTH, Attorneys for Defendant 28 STIPULATION 2 No. 2:16-cv-2060 DB 1 2 3 Dated: June 28, 2018 WEEMS LAW OFFICES /s/Robert C. Weems Robert C. Weems, Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 6 7 8 9 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2018 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.soc sec\thomas2060.stip.eaja.ord 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION 3 No. 2:16-cv-2060 DB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?