Brooke v. Capitol Regency LLC

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/9/17: The referral of this case to the magistrate judge is withdrawn and the case is referred back to the district judge. March 1, 2017 hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss is vacated.(Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

THERESA BROOKE, a married woman
dealing with her sole and separate claim,
Plaintiff,

13

ORDER
v.

14
15
16

No. 2:16-cv-2070-JAM-EFB

CAPITOL REGENCY LLC, a California
limited liability company dba Hyatt
Regency Sacramento,
Defendant.

17
18
19

This case, in which plaintiff was proceeding in propria persona, was before the

20

undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. §

21

636(b)(1). On February 8, 2017, attorney Peter Kristofer Strojnik filed a notice of appearance as

22

attorney of record for plaintiff. ECF No. 17.
Because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, the referral to the magistrate judge will

23
24

be withdrawn and the case will be referred back to the district judge. The undersigned will,

25

however, continue to perform the usual discovery tasks associated with ordinary civil cases.

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////

1

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the referral of this case to the magistrate judge

2

is withdrawn and the case is referred back to the district judge. All hearing dates set before the

3

undersigned, including the March 1, 2017 hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss, are vacated.

4

DATED: February 9, 2017.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2