Coulter v James et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by District Judge Stanley A Bastian on 03/01/17 ORDERING that, pursuant to the parties' 10 Stipulation, the hearing on the 8 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 04/13/17 without oral argument. Any opposition and reply are due in accordance with the Local Rules; the due date for the Joint Status Report is continued until 7 days after any Answer is filed in this action. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

AT SACRAMENTO

9
10 CHRISTOPHER COULTER,
11

Plaintiff,

12

No. 2:16-cv-02076-SB

v.

13 THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR

ORDER CONTINUING

14 FORCE, DEBORAH LEE JAMES,

HEARING ON MOTION TO

15 SECRETRARY OF THE DEPARTMENT

DISMISS

16 OF THE AIR FORCE, UNITED STATES
17 OF AMERICA, AND DOES 1-20,
18

Defendants.

19
20

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation Continuing Dates Related to

21 Pending Motion and Joint Status Report, ECF No. 10.
22

The parties ask that the pending hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

23 be continued and the due date for the Joint Status Report be continued until 7 days
24 after any Answer is filed in this action. Good cause exists to grant the parties’
25 request.
26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

27

1. The parties’ Stipulation Continuing Dates Related to Pending Motion

28 and Joint Status Report, ECF No. 10, is GRANTED.
ORDER DENYING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER ~ 1

1

2. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 8, is continued

2 to April 13 2017, without oral argument.
3

3. Any opposition and reply are due in accordance with the Local Rules.

4

4. The due date for the Joint Status Report is continued until 7 days after

5 any Answer is filed in this action.
6

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Order

7 and forward copies to counsel.
8

DATED this 1st day of March 2017.

9
10
11
12

_______________________________
Stanley A. Bastian
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DENYING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER ~ 2