Chastang v. Baughman et al

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/17/18 ORDERING within 14 days from the date of this order, defendants shall respond to plaintiff's motion for a 90 day extension of time 44 . (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LOTICOL CHASTANG,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-2080 JAM KJN P

v.

ORDER

D. BAUGHMAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. On August 3, 2018, defendants

18

filed a motion for summary judgment. On September 11, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to file his

19

opposition within fourteen days. On September 12, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion for extension of

20

time to file an opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which was signed by

21

plaintiff on September 5, 2018. Plaintiff seeks a 90-day extension of time on the grounds that he

22

was placed in administrative segregation on August 9, 2018, and when his property was returned,

23

half of his legal documents, research and summary judgment were missing. (ECF No. 44.)
Good cause appearing, defendants shall respond to plaintiff’s motion for extension of time

24
25

within fourteen days from the date of this order. Such response shall include addressing whether

26

plaintiff has possession of defendants’ motion for summary judgment and supporting documents.

27

////

28

////

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days from the date of this order,

2

defendants shall respond to plaintiff’s motion for a 90-day extension of time (ECF No. 44).

3

Dated: September 17, 2018

4
5
6
chas2080.fb

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2