Martin v. Sacramento Sheriff Department et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/15/2017 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in compliance with the court's order filed 3/31/2017.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CURT MARTIN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-2082 KJM DB P
v.
ORDER
SACRAMENTO SHERIFF DEPT.,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights
17
18
action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an order filed March 31, 2017, the court dismissed plaintiff’s
19
complaint and gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Those thirty days have
20
passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s
21
order.
Plaintiff will be given another opportunity to amend his complaint. Plaintiff is advised
22
23
that his failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with the court’s March 31 order may
24
result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P.
25
41(b).
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order,
2
plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in compliance with the court’s order filed March 31,
3
2017.
4
DATED: May 15, 2017
5
6
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/mart2082.fta
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?