Martin v. Sacramento Sheriff Department et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/15/2017 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in compliance with the court's order filed 3/31/2017.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURT MARTIN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2082 KJM DB P v. ORDER SACRAMENTO SHERIFF DEPT., 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 17 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an order filed March 31, 2017, the court dismissed plaintiff’s 19 complaint and gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Those thirty days have 20 passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s 21 order. Plaintiff will be given another opportunity to amend his complaint. Plaintiff is advised 22 23 that his failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with the court’s March 31 order may 24 result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 25 41(b). 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order, 2 plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in compliance with the court’s order filed March 31, 3 2017. 4 DATED: May 15, 2017 5 6 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DLB:9 DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/mart2082.fta 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?