Robinson, et al. v. Stockton Unified School District, et al.

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/31/17 ORDERING plaintiff's 19 Request for Extension/Continue is GRANTED; Plaintiffs shall file a substitution of counsel within 20 days; Defendant's 10 17 motions on calendar for 04/06/17 and 04/20/17 are VACATED. The motions will be recalendared for hearing expeditiously upon filing of the substitution of counsel on behalf of plaintiffs, or in the event no substitution is filed. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONNY ROBINSON, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:16-cv-2111 KJM GGH ORDER STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has requested a continuance of the motions pending on the court’s April 6, 2017 18 and April 20, 2017 calendars, 1 to permit time for plaintiffs to substitute an attorney to represent 19 them. ECF No. 19. Defendant Stockton Unified School District has opposed the plaintiff’s 20 motion. 21 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Plaintiffs’ request for an extension of time is granted; and 2. Plaintiffs shall file a substitution of counsel within twenty (20) days from the date 23 24 of this order; 25 //// 26 27 28 1 Defendant Stockton Unified School District has moved for Quash or Dismissal, ECF No. 10, and defendant Darren Sandoval has moved for dismissal or, in the alternative for a More Definite Statement, ECF No. 17. 1 1 3. Defendants’ motions on calendar for April 6 and April 20, 2017, are vacated. The 2 motions will be recalendared for hearing expeditiously upon filing of the substitution of counsel 3 on behalf of plaintiffs, or in the event no substitution is filed. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2017 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?