Adkins v. Brink's In.
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge William H Orrick, III on 3/3/17: Case Management Conference in this action is continued to May 30, 2017 at 3 p.m. A further Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed on or before May 23, 2017. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
BECKI D. GRAHAM, State Bar No. 238010
becki.graham@ogletree.com
ROSHNI CHAUDHARI, State Bar No. 310612
roshni.chaudhari@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
BRINK’S INCORPORATED
8
9
10
11
ADAM ROSE, State Bar No. 210880
adam@starrlaw.com
LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT L. STARR
23901 Calabasas Road, Suite 2072
Telephone:
818.225.9040
Facsimile:
818.225.9042
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WILLIAM ADKINS
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
WILLIAM ADKINS, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
19
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
vs.
21
Case No. 2:16-cv-02115-WHO
BRINK’S, INC.,
22
23
Defendant.
Complaint Filed: September 2, 2016
Trial Date:
None Set
Judge:
Hon. William H. Orrick, III
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 2:16-cv-02115-WHO
1
STIPULATION
2
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED by and between plaintiff William
3
Adkins (“Plaintiff”), by his attorneys of records (“Plaintiff”), and defendant Brink’s, Incorporated
4
(“Defendant”), by its attorneys of record (collectively, the “Parties”), that this Stipulation may be
5
entered as an Order by the Court to give effect to the stipulations set forth below:
6
WHEREAS on January 17, 2017, the Parties appeared telephonically before Hon. William
7
H. Orrick III for the case’s initial Case Management Conference (“CMC”), during which the Court
8
referred the case to ADR and continued the CMC for two months, to March 13, 2017, in the event
9
ADR was unsuccessful;
10
11
WHEREAS on February 10, 2017, the Parties were referred to Magistrate Judge Barnes to
schedule a settlement conference as their jointly requested form of ADR;
12
13
WHEREAS on February 17, 2017, the Parties were ordered to participate in a settlement
conference before Magistrate Judge Barnes on May 17, 2017 (one of the first dates available);
14
15
WHEREAS the currently scheduled continued CMC is therefore scheduled to take place
prior to the Court-ordered ADR;
16
WHEREAS the Parties are informed and believe that the Court originally intended to
17
schedule a continued CMC to take place after ADR, and further agree that the Court and the Parties
18
would be best served if the continued CMC was rescheduled for a date after the May 17, 2017
19
settlement conference;
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 2:16-cv-02115-WHO
1
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate
2 and request that the March 13, 2017 CMC be continued to May 22, 2017 or as soon thereafter as
3 ordered by the Court.
4
5
DATED: February 28, 2017
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK
& STEWART, P.C.
6
7
By:
8
9
/s/ Roshni Chaudhari
Becki D. Graham
Roshni Chaudhari
Attorneys for Defendant
BRINK’S INCORPORATED
10
11
12
DATED: February 28, 2017
LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT L. STARR
13
14
By:
15
/s/ Adam Rose (as authorized on 02/28/17)
Adam Rose
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WILLIAM ADKINS
16
17
18
ORDER
Good cause appearing therefore and pursuant to the parties’ agreement and stipulation, it is
19
20 hereby ORDERED that the Case Management Conference in this action is continued to May 30,
21
2017 at 3 p.m. A further Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed on or before May 23,
22 2017.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
DATED: March , 2017
Honorable, William H. Orrick, III
United States District Judge
Eastern District of California
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 2:16-cv-02115-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?