Adkins v. Brink's In.

Filing 33

ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by William H Orrick, III on 9/5/17: The court retains jurisdiction for forty-five days to enforce the parties' settlement terms. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4

Adam Rose (210880)
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT STARR, APC
23901 Calabasas Road, #2072
Calabasas, California 91302
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6

Attorney for Plaintiff
William Adkins

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

WILLIAM ADKINS,
11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13
14

BRINK'S, INC.,

15

Defendant.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:16-cv-02115-WHO

[Proposed]
ORDER DISMISSING CASE

17

Based on this Court’s order dated August 18, 2017 granting Plaintiff’s

18
19

motion for approval of settlement and the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal filed

20

August 30, 2017, plaintiff William Adkins’ PAGA representative claims and

21

FLSA collective action claims, as stated in the first and second causes of action,

22

are dismissed without prejudice, and plaintiff’s first through fifth causes of action

23

as asserted on behalf of himself individually are dismissed with prejudice. The

24
25
26
27
28

court retains jurisdiction for forty-five days to enforce the parties’ settlement
terms.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: September 5, 2017

________________________
Hon. Judge William Orrick

1
[Proposed] ORDER DISMISSING CASE