Adkins v. Brink's In.

Filing 33

ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by William H Orrick, III on 9/5/17: The court retains jurisdiction for forty-five days to enforce the parties' settlement terms. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Adam Rose (210880) adam@starrlaw.com LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT STARR, APC 23901 Calabasas Road, #2072 Calabasas, California 91302 Telephone: (818) 225-9040 Facsimile: (818) 225-9042 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff William Adkins 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 WILLIAM ADKINS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 BRINK'S, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-02115-WHO [Proposed] ORDER DISMISSING CASE 17 Based on this Court’s order dated August 18, 2017 granting Plaintiff’s 18 19 motion for approval of settlement and the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal filed 20 August 30, 2017, plaintiff William Adkins’ PAGA representative claims and 21 FLSA collective action claims, as stated in the first and second causes of action, 22 are dismissed without prejudice, and plaintiff’s first through fifth causes of action 23 as asserted on behalf of himself individually are dismissed with prejudice. The 24 25 26 27 28 court retains jurisdiction for forty-five days to enforce the parties’ settlement terms. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: September 5, 2017 ________________________ Hon. Judge William Orrick 1 [Proposed] ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?