Pervaiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/16/16 GRANTING 13 Motion to Strike 12 Statement of Remand. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MUHAMMAD NAYYAR PERVAIZ, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:16-cv-2118-KJM-KJN PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 17 18 On November 10, 2016, plaintiff filed a “statement of remand,” which the court liberally 19 construes as a motion to remand. (ECF No. 12.) Thereafter, on November 14, 2016, the 20 Commissioner filed a motion to strike plaintiff’s motion to remand on the basis that it is 21 premature. (ECF No. 13.) The Commissioner’s counsel explained that she is still assembling the 22 administrative record, and once that is complete, she will be able to consider plaintiff’s request 23 for a voluntary remand. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The Commissioner’s motion to strike (ECF No. 13) is granted. 26 2. Plaintiff’s “statement of remand,” liberally construed as a motion to remand, is 27 28 STRICKEN without prejudice as premature. 3. Once the Commissioner has completed assembly of the administrative record and 1 1 review of plaintiff’s request for voluntary remand, the Commissioner shall promptly 2 file the administrative record and notify plaintiff of its decision on the request for 3 voluntary remand, and shall also file a brief notice regarding the Commissioner’s 4 decision on the court’s docket. 5 4. If the Commissioner does not agree to a voluntary remand, plaintiff shall file his 6 motion for summary judgment/remand within 45 days of the Commissioner’s notice 7 declining to voluntarily remand the action. 8 5. All other briefing deadlines outlined in the initial scheduling order remain unchanged. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: November 16, 2016 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?