Interactive Intelligence CaaS, Inc. v. Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/25/2016 ORDERING that Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED to 12/1/2016. The deadline to file the Joint Status Report includin gthe Rule 26(f) discovery plan is EXTENDED to 12/14/2016. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 4 BOUTIN JONES INC. Michael E. Chase, SBN 214506 Bashar S. Ahmad, SBN 258619 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500 Sacramento, CA 95814-4603 Telephone: (916) 321-4444 Facsimile: (916) 441-7597 5 Attorneys for Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC 2 3 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE CAAS, INC., 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. PARAMOUNT EQUITY MORTGAGE, LLC, 14 Defendant. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-02122-JAM-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT 17 18 STIPULATION 19 WHEREAS, on September 6, 2016 Plaintiff Interactive Intelligence CaaS, Inc. ("Plaintiff") 20 filed a Complaint for Damages for Breach of Contract (“Complaint”) against Defendant 21 Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC ("Defendant") (Plaintiff and Defendant are sometimes referred 22 to collectively as “the Parties”). 23 24 WHEREAS, Defendant’s original deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint was October 4, 2016. 25 WHEREAS, on September 15, 2016, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective 26 counsel, stipulated to extend Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint to November 1, 27 2016 (Doc. No. 6). 28 ________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -1825466.1 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Order Requiring Joint Status Report dated September 2 6, 2016 (Doc. No. 4), the Parties’ current deadline to file the Joint Status Report including the Rule 3 26(f) discovery plan, after meeting and conferring as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), is 4 November 14, 2016. 5 WHEREAS, the Parties’ representatives have met, in person, to engage in compromise 6 negotiations within the meaning of Fed. R. Evid. 408 and continue to attempt to resolve this matter 7 through direct communications. 8 NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel, 9 hereby stipulate that Defendant shall have a further extension through and including December 1, 10 2016 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 11 Plaintiff and Defendant further stipulate and request that, to enable the Parties to continue 12 with their compromise negotiations, the Parties’ deadline to file the Joint Status Report including 13 the Rule 26(f) discovery plan be extended thirty days to December 14, 2016. 14 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: October 25, 2016 BOUTIN JONES INC. 16 By: 17 18 19 20 /s/ Michael E. Chase Michael E. Chase Bashar S. Ahmad Attorneys for Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC Dated: October 25, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF GREGG A. RAPOPORT 21 22 By: 23 24 /s/ Gregg A. Rapoport* Gregg A. Rapoport Attorneys for Interactive Intelligence CaaS, Inc. 25 26 * filed with permission obtained October 25, 2016. 27 28 ________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -2825466.1 1 ORDER 2 Upon the stipulation of Plaintiff Interactive Intelligence CaaS, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and 3 Defendant Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC ("Defendant"), by and through their respective 4 counsel, and good cause appearing, 5 6 IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended to December 1, 2016. 7 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline to file the Joint Status Report including the Rule 26(f) discovery plan is extended to December 14, 2016. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED 11 12 Dated: 10/25/2016 13 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -3825466.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?