Interactive Intelligence CaaS, Inc. v. Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/25/2016 ORDERING that Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED to 12/1/2016. The deadline to file the Joint Status Report includin gthe Rule 26(f) discovery plan is EXTENDED to 12/14/2016. (Zignago, K.)
1
4
BOUTIN JONES INC.
Michael E. Chase, SBN 214506
Bashar S. Ahmad, SBN 258619
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500
Sacramento, CA 95814-4603
Telephone: (916) 321-4444
Facsimile: (916) 441-7597
5
Attorneys for Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC
2
3
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE CAAS,
INC.,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
PARAMOUNT EQUITY MORTGAGE, LLC,
14
Defendant.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02122-JAM-GGH
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND
EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE
JOINT STATUS REPORT
17
18
STIPULATION
19
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2016 Plaintiff Interactive Intelligence CaaS, Inc. ("Plaintiff")
20
filed a Complaint for Damages for Breach of Contract (“Complaint”) against Defendant
21
Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC ("Defendant") (Plaintiff and Defendant are sometimes referred
22
to collectively as “the Parties”).
23
24
WHEREAS, Defendant’s original deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint was
October 4, 2016.
25
WHEREAS, on September 15, 2016, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective
26
counsel, stipulated to extend Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint to November 1,
27
2016 (Doc. No. 6).
28
________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
-1825466.1
1
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Order Requiring Joint Status Report dated September
2
6, 2016 (Doc. No. 4), the Parties’ current deadline to file the Joint Status Report including the Rule
3
26(f) discovery plan, after meeting and conferring as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), is
4
November 14, 2016.
5
WHEREAS, the Parties’ representatives have met, in person, to engage in compromise
6
negotiations within the meaning of Fed. R. Evid. 408 and continue to attempt to resolve this matter
7
through direct communications.
8
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel,
9
hereby stipulate that Defendant shall have a further extension through and including December 1,
10
2016 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
11
Plaintiff and Defendant further stipulate and request that, to enable the Parties to continue
12
with their compromise negotiations, the Parties’ deadline to file the Joint Status Report including
13
the Rule 26(f) discovery plan be extended thirty days to December 14, 2016.
14
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: October 25, 2016
BOUTIN JONES INC.
16
By:
17
18
19
20
/s/ Michael E. Chase
Michael E. Chase
Bashar S. Ahmad
Attorneys for Paramount Equity Mortgage,
LLC
Dated: October 25, 2016
LAW OFFICES OF GREGG A.
RAPOPORT
21
22
By:
23
24
/s/ Gregg A. Rapoport*
Gregg A. Rapoport
Attorneys for Interactive Intelligence CaaS,
Inc.
25
26
* filed with permission obtained October 25, 2016.
27
28
________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
-2825466.1
1
ORDER
2
Upon the stipulation of Plaintiff Interactive Intelligence CaaS, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and
3
Defendant Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC ("Defendant"), by and through their respective
4
counsel, and good cause appearing,
5
6
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is
extended to December 1, 2016.
7
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline to file the Joint Status Report including
the Rule 26(f) discovery plan is extended to December 14, 2016.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED
11
12
Dated: 10/25/2016
13
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
-3825466.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?