Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/14/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 3/15/2017. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Jared T. Walker (SB#269029) 2020 Capitol Avenue Suite 7 Sacramento, CA 95811 T: (916) 476-5044 F: (916) 476-5064 jared@saclawoffices.com Attorney for Plaintiff, SHAWNA M. NELSON 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHAWNA M. NELSON, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 Case No.: 2:16-cv-02125-CKD v. STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, 17 that the time for Plaintiff to file her motion for summary judgment be extended thirty (30) days until 18 March 15, 2017. This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, 19 Plaintiff’s counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff’s opening brief in accordance with the current 20 scheduling order due to counsel’s current workload which has involved conflicting deadlines in 21 unrelated matters. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF 1 Dated: February 13, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 2 /s/ Jared T. Walker Jared T. Walker, Attorney for Plaintiff 3 4 SO STIPULATED: PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 5 6 7 Dated: February 13, 2017 8 9 By: /s/ Jeffrey Chen* (authorized by e-mail on 2/13/2017) Jeffrey Chen Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 10 ORDER 11 12 13 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 14 15 16 17 Dated: February 14, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?