Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/22/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 4/5/2017. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
Jared T. Walker (SB#269029)
2020 Capitol Avenue
Suite 7
Sacramento, CA 95811
T: (916) 476-5044
F: (916) 476-5064
jared@saclawoffices.com
Attorney for Plaintiff,
SHAWNA M. NELSON
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SHAWNA M. NELSON,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
Case No.: 2:16-cv-02125-CKD
v.
STIPULATION FOR 21 DAY EXTENSION
FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING
BRIEF
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security,
13
Defendant.
14
15
16
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record,
17
that the time for Plaintiff to file her motion for summary judgment be extended twenty-one (21) days
18
until April 5, 2017. This is Plaintiff’s second request for an extension of time. Plaintiff’s counsel
19
requires additional time to prepare Plaintiff’s opening brief in accordance with the current
20
scheduling order due to the length of the administrative record in this matter which exceeds 1,500
21
pages of documents.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
1
Dated: March 15, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
2
/s/ Jared T. Walker
Jared T. Walker,
Attorney for Plaintiff
3
4
SO STIPULATED:
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
5
6
7
Dated: March 15, 2017
8
9
By:
/s/ Michael Marriott, esq. for Jeffrey Chen*
(authorized by e-mail on 3/15/2017)
Jeffrey Chen
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
10
ORDER
11
12
13
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
14
15
16
17
Dated: March 22, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?