Parker v. District Attorney's Office of Sacramento, CA

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/9/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Request to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2 ) is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal with all entries on the form completed. Plaitiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to renew the IFP application in proper form. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AKIKA PARKER,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:16-CV-2140 TLN AC (PS)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE of
SACRAMENTO CA,
Defendant.

17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the
18
undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis
19
(“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2.
20
Plaintiff’s IFP application does not make the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
21
According to the application, plaintiff received money from “Business, profession or other self22
employment,” and from “other sources” during the past 12 months. ECF No. 2 at 1 ¶ 3(a), (f).
23
However, plaintiff fails to disclose “the amount received and what you expect you will continue
24
to receive.” See Id. at 1-2.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
26
1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED without prejudice to its
27
renewal with all entries on the form completed.
28
1

1

2. Plai
intiff is gran 30 days from the dat of this ord to renew the IFP app
nted
ate
der
w
plication in

2

pr
roper form. Plaintiff is cautioned tha failure to t
P
c
at
timely renew the IFP in proper form may result
w
m

3

in a recommen
ndation that this action be dismissed
b
d.

4

DA
ATED: Sep
ptember 9, 20
016.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2