Parker v. District Attorney's Office of Sacramento, CA

Filing 9

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/31/17. RECOMMENING that that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AKIKA PARKER,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:16-cv-02140 TLN AC (PS)

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF
SACRAMENTO, CA,
Defendant.

17
18

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the

19

undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On November 1,

20

2016, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint because it named only defendants who are

21

immune from suit. ECF No. 7. The court granted plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint.

22

Id. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. On June 7, 2017, this court issued an order to

23

show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF

24

No. 8. Plaintiff filed no response.

25

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without

26

prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with

27

the court’s order. See Olivares v. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995) (affirming dismissal

28

for failure to pay partial filing fee under IFP statute); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (lack of prosecution);
1

1
2

Local Rule 110 (failure to comply with court orders).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

3

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

4

(14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

5

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

6

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

7

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.

8

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

9

DATED: August 31, 2017

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2