Vang et al v. Lopey, et al.,
Filing
49
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/03/17 ORDERING that Defendant California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection's time to respond to the complaint is EXTENDED to 02/06/17. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
KATHLEEN A. KENEALY
Acting Attorney General of California
RANDY BARROW
MARK R. BECKINGTON
GAVIN G. MCCABE
Supervising Deputy Attorneys General
ALLISON GOLDSMITH (SBN 238263)
MARC N. MELNICK (SBN 168187)
GEORGE WATERS (SBN 88295)
Deputy Attorneys General
1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor
P.O. Box 70550
Oakland, CA 94612-0550
Telephone: (510) 879-0750
Fax: (510) 622-2270
E-mail: Marc.Melnick@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection and Alex Nishimura
10
11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
JESSE VANG et al.,
No. 2:16-CV-02172-JAM-CMK
15
16
v.
Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR CAL
FIRE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
17
18
19
SHERIFF JON LOPEY et al.,
Dept:
Judge:
6
The Honorable John A.
Mendez
Defendants. Trial Date:
None Set
Action Filed: Sept. 12, 2016
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR CAL FIRE TO RESPOND (No. 2:16-CV-02172-JAM-CMK)
1
Plaintiffs Jesse Vang et al. and defendant California Department of Forestry and Fire
2
Protection (“CAL FIRE”) have previously stipulated to extend the time for CAL FIRE to respond
3
to the complaint to December 8, 2016, and Court has in an order dated December 2, 2016 (and
4
pursuant to the parties’ stipulation) extended that time to January 7, 2017. The parties are
5
awaiting the Court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss and the motion to strike filed by defendants
6
Sheriff Jon Lopey, Colleen Setzer, and County of Siskiyou (collectively, “Siskiyou County
7
Defendants”); those motions were set for hearing on November 15, 2016. The Court ordered the
8
motions submitted without appearance and without argument. The Court has not yet ruled on
9
those motions. The Court’s ruling on those motions may cause Plaintiffs to file an amended
10
complaint.
11
Pursuant to Rule 144(a) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court,
12
Eastern District of California, therefore, Plaintiffs, CAL FIRE, Siskiyou County Defendants, and
13
defendant Alex Nishimura hereby stipulate to extend the time for CAL FIRE to respond to the
14
complaint by a further thirty (30) days, to February 6, 2017. If Plaintiffs file an amended
15
complaint, the time to respond shall be set by rule or by the Court, and may be extended by
16
stipulation or by the Court. By executing this stipulation, the parties do not waive any arguments
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1.
STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR CAL FIRE TO RESPOND (No. 2:16-CV-02172-JAM-CMK)
1
they may have in this case.
2
3
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: January 3, 2017
4
/s/ Kyndra S. Miller, as authorized 1/3/17
5
KYNDRA S. MILLER
Attorney for Plaintiffs
6
7
KATHLEEN A. KENEALY
Acting Attorney General of California
Dated: January 3, 2017
8
9
/s/ Marc N. Melnick
10
MARC N. MELNICK
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
and Alex Nishimura
11
12
13
Dated: January 3, 2017
SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT
14
/s/ Domenic D. Spinelli, as authorized 1/3/17
15
DOMENIC D. SPINELLI
Attorneys for Siskiyou County Defendants
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection’s
19
time to respond to the complaint is extended to February 6, 2017.
20
Dated: 1/3/2017
21
22
/s/ John A. Mendez__________
JOHN A. MENDEZ
Judge of the U.S. District Court
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
STIP. & [PROP.] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR CAL FIRE TO RESPOND (No. 2:16-CV-02172-JAM-CMK)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?